Mumblr Bytes

“I just want to this about that.”
― Steven C. Smith

Earn a Living. Keep a Life.

Every time I go to Australia, I notice the same thing.

People move.

Mooloolaba on a weekday evening is not quiet. It is busy in the best possible way. Surfboards tucked under arms. Teenagers charging into waves with heroic optimism. Parents wading in while pretending to supervise. Retirees walking briskly along the promenade as if the sunset has an appointment with them.

One of the harder tasks that evening would have been to locate someone unused to movement. I am sure they exist. I simply could not find one without squinting.

No one looked sculpted. No one looked staged. They just looked comfortable in their bodies.


In Brisbane, I rode an electric motor assisted bike along well-established cycling pathways that ran confidently through the city. Wide. Smooth. Built for use, not decoration. The motor gave a gentle nudge. My legs still had to negotiate with gravity. It was tremendous fun.

Researchers call this “green exercise”. Even five minutes outdoors measurably improves mood. Add water and the effect deepens. Some cultures read that research and nod. Others quietly build cities around it.

“But I Don’t Have Time.”

This is the most honest objection. I have used it myself.

Work expands. Responsibilities multiply. Time shrinks. The calendar fills before breakfast.

I have run alongside N. Chandrasekaran when he was leading TCS. Early mornings. No audience. No commentary. If anyone could claim a shortage of time, it would have been him.

Barack Obama kept basketball in his routine while running the United States. Once requiring 12 stitches on his lips after getting injured. The republic survived.

I know numerous CXOs, heads of government bodies, social sector leaders, entrepreneurs who are busy as hell. Flights. Board packs. Investor calls. Policy crises. Yet they paddle. They walk. They play racquet sport. They run. They jog. They lift. They take the stairs.

Not because they have spare time.

Because they decided movement was not optional.

Time is rarely found. It is allocated.

Movement is maintenance of the machine that earns the living. If we neglect the machine long enough, it negotiates back.

“But Those Are Developed Countries.”

That is the other line I hear. And it is partly true.

Yes, Denmark has cycle lanes drawn with engineering pride. Sweden has the sommarstuga, small summer houses by lakes and forests where families retreat and reset. Ministers pedal home. Children cycle to school.

But this is as much about habit as it is about GDP.

One of the most inspiring sights in India is not a luxury gym. It is the open gym in a roadside park in a small town. Bright blue metal machines. Men rotating shoulders at dawn. Women walking in determined groups of three. Elderly gentlemen comparing blood pressure readings between stretches. Children hanging upside down for no reason at all.

No membership fee. No mirrors. No curated playlist.

Just bodies in motion.

We may not have surf breaks or flawless pathways. We have streets. Parks. Stairs. Terraces. Even uneven pavements that double as balance training.

We also have carb-rich festivals and, I am told, a South Asian genetic tendency to store weight enthusiastically around the belly. It was oddly comforting to read that. The gene did it. Not the second helping of dessert.

Genes, though, are tendencies. Not verdicts.

What Movement Really Buys You

Physical routines are often reduced to athletic ambition. They are something quieter and more durable. They are social glue.

A walk becomes conversation. A racquet game becomes laughter. A morning jog becomes a circle of familiar faces who nod at each other without introductions.

Compare that with the modern alternative. The thumb now does heroic labour. What once required forearms and shoulders is handled by a finger and a screen. Groceries arrive because someone races through traffic to ensure the curd reaches us in ten minutes.

We scroll. We argue energetically with strangers about distant political theatre. We accumulate opinions. We lose posture.

We have built lives that demand enormous mental output to earn a livelihood. That is fair. That is ambition.

But the answer cannot be to give up life in order to make a living.

Muscles need stretch. Lungs need demand. Eyes need horizons that are not backlit.

Push, yes. But push under the sky sometimes.

We have what we have. Whatever your shape. Wherever you are. We can do a little more.

I resolve to walk more. To ride when I can. To stretch before scrolling. To argue less and move more.

Earn a living.

Keep a life.

The belly gene may still visit.

But so will the wind.

How to Say a Lot Without Saying Much

The Backstreet Boys once sang, “It’s only words.”

Which, at the time, felt like a tragic discovery. A young man realising that “I love you” had begun to sound like “please pass the salt”. The words were still there. The meaning had quietly packed its bags and left.

I thought of that line again when I heard Mark Carney at Davos say, “If you are not at the table, you are on the menu.”

It is only words. Fourteen of them. But suddenly you can see the situation. A table. A menu. A future you would rather not be part of. No charts. No jargon. Just a mental picture and a mild sense of doom.

This is not about politics or ideology.

It is about language. About how some sentences do more work than entire policy documents.
“Fear itself.” “You can’t eat ideology.” “No one left behind.” “Kindness is not a weakness.”

These are not explanations. They are handles. You can pick them up and carry them around. They survive translation. They survive headlines. And the passage of time.

I remember the original Tata Indica tagline. “More car per car.”
Not mileage.
Not torque.
Just an idea small enough to fit in your pocket.

These lines do the same thing.
More meaning per word.

Which brings us back to the Backstreet Boys. They were right, in a strange way.

It is only words. But that is exactly why it matters. When words are simple, visual and human, they stop being decoration and start becoming containers. They hold fear. Or dignity. Or hope. Or threat. Or belonging.

So a boy band lyric and a Davos soundbite end up doing the same job: reminding us that language, when it works, doesn’t shout.
It packs.
And once it packs well enough, it travels further than speeches ever will.

Only words.
But very well packed ones.

What follows is a small curation of 20 of my favourite “more meaning per word” lines — from leaders and thinkers.

Not for their politics, but for how neatly they pack a worldview into a sentence.

If you have a line like this — one that stuck with you long after the speech was forgotten — I’d love to add it to the collection.

My List

“We will not beg.” — Paul Kagame

“Peace is made with enemies, not with friends.” — Yitzhak Rabin

“You can’t eat ideology.” — Mahathir Mohamad

“No one left behind.” — Anthony Albanese

“It does not matter whether a cat is black or white, as long as it catches mice.” — Deng Xiaoping

“Kindness is not a weakness.” — Julia Gillard

“You Are Either With Us, Or With the Terrorists.” — George W. Bush

“Development is about people, not things.” — Julius Nyerere

“Speak softly and carry a big stick.” — Theodore Roosevelt

“We want life like other peoples want life.” — Mahmoud Darwish

“The world is bigger than five.” — Recep Tayyip Erdoğan

“Real power is… when you have nothing, you still have dignity.” — Nelson Mandela

“Hide your strength, bide your time.” — Deng Xiaoping

“If you are not at the table, you are on the menu.” — Mark Carney

“Minimum government, maximum governance.” — Narendra Modi

“An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.” — Mahatma Gandhi

“A nation should not be judged by how it treats its highest citizens, but its lowest ones.” — Nelson Mandela

“We will make Singapore a first-world oasis in a third-world region.” — Lee Kuan Yew

“The only thing we have to fear is… fear itself.” — Franklin D. Roosevelt

“Optimists and pessimists die the same way. They just live differently.” — Shimon Peres

Your turn. What are lines that have stayed with you?

A Small Defence Of Thinking

There is a newsreader on television. Serious desk. Serious lighting. Serious voice.

A small slip of paper is placed on his desk, marked as a bulletin, the kind that usually signals something important.

He does not read it privately.
He does not check what it says. Or whether it makes sense.

He looks into the camera and announces, with grave authority:

“I have just been handed a bulletin. It says… I have spinach in my teeth.”

He reads this with the same tone he would use for an earthquake or a national election.

No pause.
No flicker of self-awareness.
No sense that this is private, trivial, or frankly not news.

A bulletin arrived. Therefore it must be read.

The process has been followed perfectly. The thinking has been politely excused from the building.
It is a neat little example of what happens when process runs without the application of mind.

That was Ted Baxter, a character from The Mary Tyler Moore Show, a popular American sitcom from the 1970s. He was written as vain, sincere, and spectacularly literal. The joke worked because the world recognised him. He felt familiar.

When the World Starts Acting Like Ted Baxter

Once you notice this, you see it everywhere.

There is the automated apology email that arrives instantly and means nothing, like a sympathy card signed by a printer. There is the birthday reminder that replaces memory with a balloon emoji and a sentence that could be sent to your plumber. There is the form that listens very attentively and then explains that your problem does not exist in any of its drop-down menus. And there is the student who becomes excellent at passing exams without ever becoming particularly good at understanding anything.

In each case, the ritual is intact. The motion is correct. The meaning has quietly slipped out through a side door.

And then we scale this up and call it management.

The engagement survey is launched with much ceremony. People answer honestly. The dashboard is generated. Colours are admired. A number is announced. Everyone nods. Nothing changes. The organisation did not want insight. It wanted a temperature reading — preferably one that does not require treatment.

Organisational and Individual Goals behave in a similar way. What can be counted slowly begins to matter more than what counts. People learn how to hit the metric rather than improve the work. Throughput goes up. Quality goes sideways. Edge cases fall off the map. The system congratulates itself for success and sends an automated thank-you note.

The bulletin has been read. The spinach remains.

A Small Defence of Thinking

Systems are very good at repeating things. They like things neat. They like things predictable. They do what they are built to do, and they do it reliably. Over time this gives us tidy processes, friendly scripts, clean dashboards, and a lot of activity.

Meaning needs something else. It needs attention. It needs someone to notice what is actually going on and respond to that rather than to the checklist. It needs a small pause before the next step.

You can see the difference in people. Some are fully in what they are doing. If they are cooking, they are cooking. If they are listening, they are listening. If they are working, they are actually at work. Being around them feels steady. The moment feels real.

Others are doing one thing while drifting through another. Replying while half replying. Listening while half listening. Living while half being there. Attention gets spread thin across too many places and leaves very little behind anywhere.

The application of mind is simply paying attention before acting. It is the moment where you ask, “What is really going on here?” It slows things down a bit. It also saves you from doing the wrong thing very well. Application of mind while reading the bulletin turns out to be a good place to begin. In a world full of scripts, the application of mind feels like a small, quietly brave act.

Word of the Year 2026

Every December, I do something that suggests a level of self-importance I do not, in fact, possess.

I choose a Word of the Year.

This is usually the sort of thing done by people who hit the gym at dawn, count their steps with devotion, and can tell you exactly what they were doing at 11:30 a.m. on a Tuesday. I cannot. And yet, year after year, I sit down and pick a single word, as though it might somehow help steer the next twelve months.

The logic is questionable. The evidence is thin. And yet, irritatingly, it works.

No thunderclaps follow. There are no cinematic montages. The word works quietly. It gives the year a loose centre of gravity. Something to return to when things get noisy, busy, or mildly absurd. A reminder of what I said I cared about, long after January’s enthusiasm has slipped away for a nap.

When motion leaves a trail

Over the years, these words have leaned towards action. They came with energy. Momentum. A faint smell of ambition. They helped me say yes more often. Try things I might otherwise have postponed. Keep moving when stopping felt tempting and the sofa looked persuasive.

Sustained motion, however, leaves a trail.

When you keep moving for long enough, things start piling up. Habits you never chose. Assumptions that arrived quietly and stayed. Ways of working that once made sense and now continue largely out of politeness. Effort slowly replaces direction. Speed starts passing for clarity.

That is usually when the browser freezes.

An image that complicated things

For a few years now, there is a small tradition in our house. My daughter designs the image for my Word of the Year. I usually nod approvingly and say something suitably thoughtful, as though I understand art at a deeper level than I actually do.

This year, I raised my eyebrows.

The image did not explain itself. It wasn’t loud. It wasn’t urging me forward. It simply sat there, colourful, poised, quietly confident. The sort of image that doesn’t chase you down, but waits patiently for you to notice.

I lived with it for a while.

Clearing the screen

As the year wound down, a few things started knocking. Politely at first. Then with mild persistence.

Direction, for one. It hadn’t gone missing. It just hadn’t been checked. Like a car that still runs fine but insists on drifting slightly left unless you keep both hands on the wheel. Rhythm too. The pace I had slipped into was busy, efficient, and strangely exhausting for something that was meant to be sustainable. Relationships made an appearance as well. Not dramatically. More like a WhatsApp message that simply says, “Are you around?”

A few beliefs needed air. Some assumptions needed sunlight. They had been sitting around for years, like unused suitcases in the loft. Perfectly intact. Slightly dusty. Quietly deciding things without being consulted.

This felt like maintenance. Clearing the screen. Checking the compass again. Making sure the wheels were still aligned. Resetting the rhythm I actually want, not the one that crept in while I was busy and congratulating myself on being productive.

The same thing showed up with people. Some relationships had grown easily, like plants that do fine if you remember to water them. Others had thinned out despite sincere messages and ambitious plans to “catch up soon.” A few survived mainly on shared history and the occasional forwarded article. What mattered here was simple. Attention. Listening properly. Staying long enough to notice what had changed.

Then there were actions and beliefs. Some still worked. Others were just familiar, like tools you keep using because they’re already in your hand. Telling the difference took time. Familiarity, it turns out, is very good at pretending to be truth.

And then the word arrived

It took longer than usual this year.

Perhaps because it wasn’t trying to impress. Perhaps because it didn’t arrive with urgency. When it finally settled, it felt obvious in hindsight.

The word is Refresh.

Quietly practical. Calmly demanding.

It holds direction, relationships, actions, beliefs, and assumptions in the same frame. It suggests care without panic. Change without theatrics. Movement with better bearings.

Why this word, this year

Refresh feels different from earlier words. It is quieter. Less performative. Slightly suspicious of urgency. Chosen with care.

The ambition is still there. It simply wants clearer sightlines.

My daughter’s image arrived at this conclusion before I did. It made me pause first and think later. That feels about right.

So Refresh is my word for 2026.

It serves as a reminder. To pause. To look again. To clean the lens before moving on.

Sometimes, the most useful thing you can do is stop clicking harder and simply hit refresh.

And if that doesn’t work, at least you can say you waited long enough to mean it.

PS: The audit of my year 2025 is here.

The Things That Worked. And the Ones That Quietly Didn’t.

Yesterday, I completed an audit of the year. I counted things. Books finished. Posts written. Work delivered. It felt good. Numbers tend to behave themselves, which is more than can be said for most of life.

But numbers are polite. They tell you what happened. They rarely tell you what it cost.

This piece stays with what the numbers were quietly pointing to, while I was busy admiring them.

What Seemed to Work

Quite a few things worked this year, and it would be churlish not to acknowledge them.

I read nine books, properly and without hurry. I have not done that in years. In a world that rewards skimming, scrolling, and nodding along to things one has not actually read, this felt like a small act of resistance. Or stubbornness. Possibly age.

More than sixty blog posts also escaped my head and entered the world. That has not happened in a long time either. Writing returned as a habit, not as an occasional ceremony involving coffee, good intentions, and eventual disappointment. If 2025 had a quiet win, this was it.

Ten pieces appeared in Founding Fuel. That mattered far more than the number suggests. The editing was demanding in the best way. Soft ideas did not survive. Better ones came back leaner and sharper. The conversations that followed were longer, deeper, and occasionally uncomfortable, which is usually how you know something worked.

I enrolled in three courses. I completed two. One remains, politely reminding me of its existence every few weeks. Each asked for time, money, and attention. All of them gave something back, which already puts them ahead of many commitments that quietly take all three and return very little.

At work, there were fresh experiments. New formats. New ways of framing familiar problems. These required courage and a fair amount of gumption, or at least the ability to sound as if I had both. Some ideas surprised me by working better than expected. A few even behaved sensibly.

I also stayed away from the news more than usual, and this time it was deliberate. It had been charging rent in my head without doing much useful work. The daily cycle is loud, repetitive, and faintly theatrical. It feels urgent while you are inside it, and oddly empty once you step out. I realised I was spending more time being informed than being wiser.

So I changed how I paid attention. I watched actions, not announcements. What actually moved once the cameras left. With the help of some outstanding friends, I stayed loosely connected to what mattered. Less churn. More patterns. It felt healthier, and oddly more informed. Not indifferent. Just clearer. This is special.

I travelled to new places this year. I will write about them in a separate post. I also worked on some relationships. They get a paragraph here. The difference between a full post and a paragraph probably says more about the distance covered in each than any honest accounting ever could.

If I stopped here, the year would look solid.

Which is exactly where trouble usually begins.

What Stayed Standing

Other things never quite worked, but they also refused to fail properly.

A few projects quietly became something else. They did not collapse. They simply declined to become what I had imagined. They stayed alive in an awkward middle state. These are worse than failures. A failure ends the story. A half-working project keeps clearing its throat and asking for attention.

Some habits looked productive while slowly draining energy. Days filled themselves effortlessly. Messages were answered. Meetings multiplied, as meetings always do, regardless of whether anyone invited them. Everything appeared under control. Over time, it became harder to tell whether effort was producing momentum or merely the appearance of it.

Health did not collapse. It was fitness slipped badly.

Family time did not disappear. It thinned. There is a suitcase that spent more time with me than my family did, which is not an achievement I intend to repeat.

No alarms went off. No urgent intervention was required. This is how deeper problems usually arrive. Quietly. Gradually. With excellent manners.

Relationships followed a similar pattern. Some were cared for properly. Conversations deepened. Trust grew. Others survived mainly because people were generous. Kindness covered many small absences. Kindness is wonderful like that. It also postpones reckoning.

I renewed connections with classmates from school, which was special. At the same time, there were many friends I meant to meet for coffee. These intentions remained noble, heartfelt, and entirely stationary.

The Questions That Wouldn’t Go Away

Even the things that worked left questions behind.

Did writing become my refuge as much as my craft? Did reading stretch my thinking, or did it soften the edges a little too comfortably? And whatever happened to the plays, performances, and long evenings of soaking in other people’s art that I was so confident I would make room for?

The fact that these questions have come up is data enough.

I am often told I am a hard marker. I usually disagree. But sitting with this year, I can see why the reputation exists.

It is easy to manage appearances. Outputs help. Stories help too. But it is much harder to mislead oneself for long. Somewhere beneath the busyness, I know what is alive and what is running on habit. I know which efforts deserve energy and which ones continue mainly because stopping would require explanation. I also know which win I wanted but did not get. No amount of other credit quite fills that gap. And that is that.

Carrying the Right Questions Forward

As the year closes, a familiar set of questions stops being polite and starts lingering.

What should I start? What should I stop? What should I do more of? What should I do less of?

Most years, these are treated like planning prompts. Lists are made with enthusiasm. Intentions are declared confidently. The calendar listens, nods, and then carries on exactly as before.

This year, the questions feel urgent. Not only because time is sprinting away, but because attention leaks are more than frustrating. These are not productivity questions. They are system questions. They ask where life actually goes once motivation gets bored and habit takes over the controls.

One question, in particular, refuses to leave.

What would I stop doing next year, even if it still sort of works?

This matters because what still works is rarely challenged. It is functional, defensible, and comfortably respectable. It quietly sets the ceiling on change. Most decline does not arrive loudly. It arrives wearing slippers and saying, “This will do.”

Wanting change turns out to be mostly decorative. Deciding helps, but not much. Without changing the system around attention, behaviour stays put. This is the point James Clear makes plainly. You do not rise to your goals. You sink to your systems.

Which makes the work ahead refreshingly practical.

What the calendar protects.
What friction gets added.
What gets removed without ceremony.
What is designed so the better choice stops requiring willpower.

This is where reflection stops being writing and starts becoming proof. Defaults win when left alone. Comfort compounds faster than effort. “Later” has a remarkable way of becoming “never.”

So the aim is not a dramatic reset. It is a structural one. Fewer defaults. Clearer constraints. Lighter suitcases. More room for what actually deserves to stay. Once the system shifts, behaviour usually follows. Quietly. Reliably. Without heroics.

That is the urgency. And that, inconveniently, is the work.

Somewhere between cheer and caution, a bell does its job. It doesn’t explain itself. It simply rings. Paying attention is left to the listener.

Merry Christmas. May your defaults behave themselves for a few days.

Audit of Me: A December Reflection on Time, Attention, and Patterns

Last week, I was trying to get a suitcase under seven kilos so it could travel with me into the cabin of an airline where certain staff members stand near the boarding gate with a stern-looking weighing scale. They do not smile. They do not negotiate. They do not believe in intentions.

This is a strange modern sport. It involves rules, judges, and quiet humiliation.

Items that had travelled loyally with me across cities and countries were suddenly asked to leave. Some without notice. The weighing scale remained unmoved. The staff remained polite and implacable.

The suitcase eventually closed. Barely.
I did not feel victorious.
I felt informed.

December has the same effect.

Time slips away quietly through the year. It carries minor shifts and major changes in the same sweep. One day you are beginning something with enthusiasm. The next, you are wondering when it became routine. And where another cherished habit quietly retreated to, without leaving a forwarding address.

That is what time does best. It does not announce change. It just keeps moving.

Boundaries of time force a pause. A year ending is, of course, an artificial boundary. The sun and sky do not care. Monday looks much like Tuesday. But the turn of the year helps us keep score. Like a measuring tape pulled out reluctantly. Slightly crude. Still useful. You may not like the number it shows you, but at least you know where you stand.

That is why December is a good time for an annual personal audit.

The gentle art of keeping score

An audit sounds serious. It need not be. This is not forensic accounting. No spreadsheets. No colour codes. Just a calm look at where things went.

Every December, I start with the calendar. I scroll slowly. Meetings appear like family photographs. Some familiar. Some puzzling. Who did I spend time with? What claimed my attention? What expanded? What quietly disappeared?

Then comes the inbox. This is where things get personal.

Which conversations mattered? Which ones grew richer and more human over time? Which relationships were nourished, sometimes deliberately, sometimes by accident? And which ones gathered dust despite the best intentions, friendly check-ins postponed indefinitely under the noble excuse of being busy?

Emails reveal more than schedules. They reveal attention. Who we return to. Who we avoid. Who stayed present through the year, and who quietly slipped into the “will reply soon” category, where messages go to rest.

Then the credit card and UPI statements. These are always revealing. Where did the money go? More importantly, does it reflect how I thought I was living? What stories am I telling myself? Behavioural economists call this data. The rest of us call it evidence.

The point is not detail.
The point is pattern.

Ordinary lives, useful reflections

Over the next few days, I am sharing my own reflections from this annual personal audit.

Now, I am, by nature, private. What follows will be general. Pointers, not particulars. There will be no confessions, no revelations, and nothing remotely sordid. I will spare you the details and offer patterns and pauses instead. Think sketches, not surveillance footage. Hopefully, just enough provocation to get you smiling and thinking about a few things of your own.

My life itself is reassuringly ordinary. Travel. Work. Conversations. Writing. A clutch of modest successes. A few misses. Some bets that went wrong with impressive efficiency. A handful taken on knowingly, which sounds bold and usually means thinking, This could go wrong, and proceeding anyway.

Why do this at all?

Because reflection rarely arrives with drama. It comes quietly. While waiting for boarding. While staring at a hotel ceiling. While realising you have told the same story twice and it sounds different the second time.

Doing it deliberately forces attention. I remember, in school, a friend playing a rather cruel prank on a teacher who took afternoon naps under a tree.

A magnifying glass.
A patch of sunlight.
A sudden awakening.

The teacher woke up with a start, clutching his forearm, which now bore a small but unmistakable scorch mark. The kind that makes a man reassess both his nap and his life choices. Let’s leave out what happened to my classmate.

The point is simpler.
Attention wakes things up.

That is why I do an annual personal audit. To clear my head. Putting thoughts into public view forces order. It removes clutter. It makes you confront what stayed and what did not. If it nudges you to glance at your own year, even briefly, that is enough.

I will write about things I got wrong and what worked despite me. The places I went and what they did not change. The people I met and the conversations that refused to be forgotten. The patterns that only show up when you stop long enough to notice.

A few questions worth sitting with

Notes From The Rear View Mirror

What did you give time to this year?
What held your attention without asking?

Which habits strengthened?
Which ones thinned out?

What is still alive?
And, what needs closing, gently, without regret?

What promises were made?
Which ones were kept?
Which ones were quietly postponed?

If these questions create mild discomfort, that is a good sign. It usually means growth occurred somewhere without sending a memo.

December invites this kind of pause. With coffee. With Wi-Fi that generously accommodates my inconsistent sense of humour. No drama required. Just enough stillness to notice what moved, what stayed, and what quietly asked for more care than it received.

Suitcases tell the truth when weight limits apply. Years do the same, if you stop long enough to listen.

The Leisure We Forgot

It was a Dallas morning, in early June this year.

Already warm. Already bright. My daughter and I were sitting in the small garden behind the house, doing nothing in particular. The kind of nothing that usually lasts only until someone reaches for a phone.

She spotted it first.

A still insect clinging to a blade of grass. Perfectly formed. Perfectly unmoving.

Dead, we assumed. And declared so. Quickly.

We still leaned in. Looked closer. It did not have the careless look of something crushed or abandoned. It seemed intact. Intentional. As if it had chosen that exact spot.

We began guessing. Beetle? Grasshopper? Something more interesting? We debated seriously, the way children do, and adults quietly enjoy. We turned it gently. Examined the legs. The head. The odd lightness of it.

Then the realisation arrived. With some help.

It was not an insect at all.

It was a shell.

A cicada had grown inside it and, at some point, calmly stepped out. Growth completed. Old skin left behind. No drama. No hurry. Just a quiet exit under the Texas sun.

What surprised me later was not the discovery itself, but how I felt afterwards. I was strangely energised. Light. Refreshed. We had not rested. We had not done anything useful. And yet something had shifted.

I noticed that I had been fully present. Not half-there. Not thinking ahead. Just there, crouched in the heat, absorbed in a small mystery. And I found myself wondering why that felt so restorative. It felt like leisure, though nothing about it resembled how leisure is usually described.

Wonder at Cruising Altitude

Two days later, I was flying from Dallas to the East Coast. Seatbelt light on. Coffee barely drinkable. Clouds stretched endlessly beneath the wing, like a slow, patient design lesson. Somewhere between cruising altitude and mild jet lag, I was reading David Steindl-Rast.

Steindl-Rast is a Benedictine monk best known for his writing on gratefulness and everyday spirituality. Not the dramatic kind. The attentive kind. And there it was, tucked into the page as if it did not need emphasis.

He wrote that leisure is not the absence of activity but the presence of wonder.

The line landed differently at 35,000 feet. The Dallas garden returned instantly. The shell. The crouching. The strange lift I had felt afterwards. That moment finally had a name.

Around that time, the idea of leisure had been circling me anyway. Conversations with friends. Reading and writing essays to clarify what leisure meant to me. Many of my friends seemed drawn to the same question. How to make time for leisure. How to protect it. And, how to schedule it before it slipped away.

Steindl-Rast’s line quietly undid all of that.

Leisure had not arrived because time had opened up that morning in Dallas. Time had not changed at all. Attention had. Wonder had been allowed in. Leisure and wonder, I realised, have less to do with calendars and far more to do with how awake we are to the moment in front of us.

Children seem to understand this without effort. They do not ask whether something is useful before being fascinated by it. A shell on a blade of grass is enough. Adults tend to wait for permission. Or purpose. Or a clear outcome.

That cicada shell offered none of those.

Not even an invitation to look closer. It sat there in casual indifference, until attention and curiosity cast their quiet spell. Something ordinary came alive. The mind loosened. And, without effort, it relaxed.

And that, it turns out, was plenty.

Leisure came not from creating space, but from entering the moment more fully.

It is December now. Many people are looking ahead to leisure. Calendars are being cleared. Time is being protected.

On that bright June morning, we discovered that the cicada shell has a small crack along its back. Nothing dramatic. Just enough for something larger to leave. I like to think wonder works in much the same way. It does not wait for empty days or perfect conditions. It slips in through small openings, through moments when attention loosens and something ordinary is allowed to surprise us. And it refreshes the soul in a remarkable way.

Yes. We could stop sealing every moment shut and not wait for free time to soak into leisure!

Books in the Time of Dopamine

The Bangalore Literature Festival has been around since 2012, but I always managed to miss it. My first glimpse of it was through friends and colleagues at Founding Fuel, Charles Assisi and NS Ramnath, authors of The Aadhaar Effect, when they spoke at the festival years ago. Since then I have been meaning to attend. Something or the other kept coming in the way. Then I read the founder’s comment on Founding Fuel about moving the festival from the five-star comfort of The Lalit Ashok to the wide open public grounds of Freedom Park. I remember thinking, Freedom Park? Interesting. The irony and the possibilities jumped out at once.

And so I finally went. The first thing that greeted me was a tall mosaic figure holding a bright red surfboard-like object with the word Freedom splashed across it. Not exactly what the British officers had in mind when they built the place, but a cheerful indication of what the day held. A few steps further was the bright @blrlitfest sign in pinks and blues. If you ever needed proof that literature can trend, this was it.

If you want to experience the full irony of modern life, go to a place once built to keep people in and watch thousands walk in voluntarily, some even jogging, to attend a literature festival. Freedom Park, the former Central Jail of Bangalore, is now a pleasant expanse of trees, sunlight, ideas, and, for a day at least, more book-loving humans than you could shake a bookmark at.

The symbolism was impossible to miss. Once, Freedom Park held prisoners in barracks with concrete beds and narrow passageways where freedom was a rumour. Now those same spaces hosted sessions on Sanskrit, parenting, news, men’s rights, and All India Radio. Chairs and yoga mats were laid out neatly across old prison beds, and people sat on them happily, notebooks open, as if taking notes in jail was the most normal thing in the world.

Bayonets and Books!

The watchtower stood tall and white in the centre, looking gently puzzled by its new job of overseeing conversations instead of convicts. A sepoy cast in stone held his rifle and stared ahead, while festival banners fluttered around him. If he ever imagined he would spend eternity watching people queue for author signings and filter coffee, he revealed nothing.

Entry was through two long parallel walls once built to contain bodies. In the evening they glowed red and seemed delighted to welcome minds instead. I could almost hear Bill Bryson remarking how human beings are the only species that would turn a former prison into a venue for people who willingly sit for hours listening to strangers discuss how to live better, write better, and occasionally argue better.

Inside the Festival: Ideas, People, and a Whiff of Possibility

The crowd was a marvellous pot-pourri. Teenagers with tote bags. Elderly couples who looked like they had stepped straight out of a Sunday crossword. Children trotting towards the #CLF area, drawn to colourful cloth canopies and cheerful storytellers. And of course a smattering of stars from Day One. Banu Mushtaq. Vir Das. Santosh Desai. Vivek Shanbag. And Shashi Tharoor, freshly returned from shaking hands with Vladimir Putin, which is not a sentence I ever expected to write. Yet there he was, surrounded by admirers, looking as though world diplomacy was merely a warm-up act for a weekend lit fest in Bangalore.

What I enjoyed most was how many remarkable authors simply wandered about. No entourage. No velvet ropes. You could walk up, say hello, and they would smile like old friends. In a world where even mid-tier influencers travel with ring lights, this felt wonderfully human. A free world, at least on that patch of reclaimed earth.

The children’s section was buzzing. Under a rainbow of cloth shades, kids sat on red chairs and listened wide-eyed to storytellers and wildlife experts. A far cry from my childhood, when literary glamour meant reading an author interview in The Hindu framed stiffly against a bookshelf. These children had open skies, soft grass, and sessions under trees. My younger self would not have known where to look.

There was also the small matter of the prison of devices. Everywhere I looked, people had put their phones away. Not in silent mode. Not in airplane mode. Properly away. Buried in bags. Forgotten. Occasionally taken out to check programme changes, especially after the Indigo fiasco caused some authors to miss their slots. It was as though the old walls had agreed to keep the devices inside and let the humans escape.

The fashion added its own subplot to the day. There were the formal types in suits. The linen types whose clothes took a moment to arrive after they did. The tight-fit types who seemed to have been sentenced to mild compression. Prints with camels, checks, stripes, feathers, hats, turbans. Greens, blues, greys, and salt-pepper combinations that could have been a paint chart. A riot, and a joyful one, united by a love for books.

I also met a few old friends, people I had worked with years ago. Some were authors now. We talked about books we were reading and books we were pretending to read. We shared recommendations. We spoke of manuscripts in progress and our quiet ambitions to one day contribute something that would sit on a table like the ones before us. These small reunions made the day feel less like an event and more like a homecoming.

Book buying was brisk. I picked up a few myself. At the end of it all, the young lady announced proudly that they accepted no credit cards. Instant debits from bank accounts are perhaps the truest measure of commitment. People paid anyway. I did too.

The organisers deserve every bit of credit. They created something warm, open, and quietly defiant at a time when reading is supposedly declining and AI, we are told, is sharpening its knives for books.

But at Freedom Park, of all places, there was a whiff of possibility. Under the watchtower that once surveyed prisoners, I watched hundreds of people sit under an open sky, listening, questioning, dreaming, and shaping answers they would take away.

Reading keeps us human. Writing keeps us honest. And festivals like these remind us that imagination is still, thankfully, unjailable.

Stop the Play, I’m Still Thinking

A Night of Theatre, Memory, and the Scripts That Refuse to Leave

Some theatre evenings feel like performances. Others feel like mirrors. This was the latter.

I expected the inaugural Udayan Bhattacharya Memorial Lecture at Nehru Centre to be solemn. Instead, it turned out warm, thoughtful and quietly humorous. The evening opened and closed with Tagore songs sung softly, as if reminding us that culture breathes best at its own pace. It was also the evening I was properly introduced to Sahana, Mumbai, a remarkable collective that has spent decades nurturing performing arts in the city with quiet resolve.

An Evening To Remember

At the centre of it all was Sunil Shanbag, one of Mumbai’s most respected theatre-makers and a protégé of the legendary Satyadev Dubey. He had the ease of someone shaped by decades of rehearsal rooms, difficult scripts and stubborn hope. Shanbag spoke calmly, stroking his goatee now and then, and made the history of Mumbai theatre feel less like a lesson and more like a stroll through a familiar neighbourhood. He offered hope simply by holding history in one hand and possibility in the other.

Somewhere along the way, a small door opened in me too, a familiar pathway to my own dalliances with theatre from years ago.

The Plays That Found Me

My introduction to theatre did not come with spotlights or pedigree. I was discovered by Prof Elango at Fourthwall, at The American College, who plucked me out of wayward obscurity and gave me a role in a play titled In the Name of God. One moment I was minding my own business, the next I was on stage wondering which limb was meant to move first. Theatre does not wait for you to be ready. It simply says, “Your turn.”

What followed was a fast, compressed and surprisingly thorough education. A little Shakespeare, a little Chekhov, and then The Zoo Story, the two-person pressure cooker that offers no escape and no excuses. Those early plays left an imprint, the way a river leaves its mark on stone. They shaped how I listened, how I observed, and how I carried myself long before I understood what they were doing.

Plays do not end when the curtain falls. They end when they are done with you. They return in airport queues and quiet mornings, tapping you on the shoulder when you least expect it. A play you performed at nineteen can return at forty with a completely different meaning. Theatre builds an internal archive without asking for permission, and it keeps adding to it long after the stage has gone dark.

For that imprint I owe a lifelong debt to Prof Elango and everyone at Fourthwall. Their passion ran on a different voltage and it sweepingly carried me along. Without them I would have remained exactly where I was, minding my business instead of discovering a new way of seeing and being.

And it was that way of seeing and being that sat upright that evening, listening to Sunil Shanbag narrate how Tagore’s play Dak Ghar had travelled all the way into Nazi Germany, slipping quietly into the shadows of the Warsaw Ghetto. It felt less like a history lesson and more like a reminder that stories often go further than their writers ever imagine.

Tagore, Korczak and a Lesson I Was Not Expecting

To understand the story, it helps to picture the Warsaw Ghetto in the early 1940s. A sealed district created by Nazi Germany. Starvation, cold and constant deportations. Entire childhoods cut short before they had begun.

In the middle of this was Janusz Korczak, whom I have been reading about ever since that evening. He was a paediatrician and educator who ran an orphanage with fierce tenderness. He believed children deserved clarity and dignity even when adults around them had lost both. His compassion was stubborn in the best possible way.

Shanbag described how Korczak used Tagore’s Dak Ghar to prepare the orphaned children for the idea of death. Amal, the sick child in the play who dreams of the world beyond his window, became a mirror for children whose own world was closing in. For many of us, this was the first time the Warsaw Ghetto was introduced not through numbers but through a play, through frightened children performing a gentle story, and through one man’s determination to give them a last taste of imagination.

The part that stayed with me came after the play. A few days later the children were marched away with hundreds of others towards the trains that would take them to a concentration camp. Adults around them wailed and collapsed. The children walked in silence, steady and composed. One of them held a violin and played as they moved. They were as ready as children can ever be for a fate they did not choose.

It struck me that the evening was as much an education about Korczak as it was about Tagore. Sometimes we learn about literature through the lives it touches. And sometimes we learn about history through the plays it chooses.

That night Korczak became the teacher and Dak Ghar became his chalk. Shanbag kept weaving that story through Mumbai’s own theatre tales, stories that were no less fascinating in their own way.

The Spaces That Built Mumbai’s Theatre

Shanbag’s stories reminded me that theatres do not just host plays. They build cities. They shape how a place thinks and imagines, held together not by budgets but by conviction.

Much of that conviction came from people like Dubey, who kept appearing in Shanbag’s telling. Dubey could spot actors who did not know they were actors, push them into difficult roles, and treat theatre as oxygen rather than entertainment. That energy seeped into the rooms where Mumbai’s theatre first found its voice.

Chhabildas: A School Hall That Sparked a Movement

The way Shanbag described Chhabildas, you could see it. A modest school hall in Dadar. A high tiled roof. A storeroom pretending to be a backstage. A toilet that worked on its own mood. Almost no equipment. And yet it became the beating heart of experimental theatre. For nearly two decades, dozens of groups performed there across languages, on diwans and rattling steel chairs, with traffic, vendors and radios leaking in from the street. On one night, even a murder downstairs.

In Shanbag’s telling, Chhabildas thrived not despite its flaws but because of them. The room taught theatre makers to be inventive, honest and fully awake to life.

Prithvi and NCPA: Spaces That Grew a City’s Confidence

Prithvi and NCPA, as Shanbag described them, were Mumbai’s two strictest teachers. Prithvi demanded intimacy, its thrust stage leaving no place to hide. NCPA offered the opposite lesson, insisting on scale and discipline. Together they taught artists to stretch, adapt and rise to whatever room held them. They were not just venues. They were training grounds.

Why Money Cannot Be the Only Question

Shanbag also traced how things shifted after 1992. As the country opened its markets, theatre was nudged into the logic of “an evening out.” Plays became shorter, lighter and more “dinner-friendly,” trimmed to suit appetites rather than ideas.

But Chhabildas reminded me of something else. Art does not need money to live. It needs people who care enough to rehearse after work, to perform in hot rooms, to sit on diwans and steel chairs and still feel something. Chhabildas did not decorate Mumbai. It animated it. It kept the city honest and awake.

Somewhere between the pollution outside and the conversation inside, something shifted. The air in the hall felt lighter, as if talking about plays and playwrights could momentarily clean a city’s lungs. It left me with nostalgia, a hint of melancholy, and most unexpectedly, hope.

Art that depends only on money cannot build a city. It can only decorate it. But art that depends on love and belief gives a city a soul.

Why Theatre Matters Even More Today

In a digital age we have traded presence for convenience. There is more to watch than ever, yet far less to truly feel. Our attention has become a marketplace and everything wants a piece of it.

Which is why theatre feels almost radical now. People in one room. Shared breathing. Shared laughter. And shared silence. No pause button. No algorithm.

Culture is not luxury. It is how a society remembers to stay human. And theatre remains one of the few places where India’s astonishing diversity gathers, listens to itself and recognises its own depth.

A week later, it still sits with me.

Stop and Smell the… Tyres?

There are mornings when coffee wakes you up. And there are mornings when the coffee seems sluggish compared to the news.

On my LinkedIn feed popped an interesting post by Intellectual Property thought leader Latha Nair: “India just got its first smell mark, that too smelling of roses! 🙂 And it must be a sweet feeling for any trademark enthusiast from India!

That was the moment my coffee stopped being a beverage and became a witness to history.

The details were even better. Sumitomo has “apparently been infusing the floral fragrance of roses into its products as an integral component of its business strategy and product development since 1995.”
And a 13-page order from the Controller General now trailblazes India’s journey into the world of non-conventional marks.

The coffee sputtered and screeched down my alimentary canal as I checked again if it was Sumitomo the tyre company.

Yes. It was.

A tyre company applying for — and getting — a smell trademark. That too, of a rose. To be infused into its products?

But here is where the fun truly begins. To register a smell, you must represent it graphically. So Sumitomo submitted a graphic of a “rose-like smell”, with the assistance of IIIT, Allahabad.

A picture of perfume?
A drawing of aroma?
Some sort of curvy line that looks like a rose caught in a Wi-Fi signal?

Which makes me wonder: What would the official graphic be for the smell of coffee?
And when do we get an emoji for “wake up and smell the coffee,” because modern civilisation is clearly running behind schedule?

Her post also quotes the order, in impeccable judicial calm, that “the scent of roses bears no direct relationship with the nature, characteristics, or use of tyres.”

I think that translates to: “This makes no earthly sense, and that is exactly why it qualifies.”

Honestly, understanding why a tyre smells like roses is about as clear as solving this week’s crossword with last week’s clues. You know something is happening. You just cannot explain what and why.

It is one of those “fact is stranger than fiction” moments.
Science fiction predicted teleportation and aliens.
Reality gave us perfumed tyres.

I am still trying to imagine that “rose-like smell” graphic.
My nose says yes.
My brain says absolutely not.
And my coffee says, “Please leave me out of this.”